The EU AI Act introduces a risk-based regulatory framework for artificial intelligence in the European Union. Depending on the AI system, its intended use and the role of the organisation involved, different compliance obligations may apply, including requirements for risk management, data governance, technical documentation, transparency, human oversight, accuracy, robustness and post-market monitoring.
For many organisations, the challenge is not only understanding which obligations apply, but also demonstrating that the right processes, documentation and controls are in place.
TÜV SÜD’s EU AI Act Conformity Assessment service helps organisations evaluate whether an AI system aligns with relevant EU AI Act requirements within a defined scope. Through a structured review of documentation, governance processes and supporting evidence, we help organisations understand their current readiness identify gaps and strengthen their compliance preparation.
The EU AI Act is being introduced in phases, which means organisations need to prepare for different requirements over time rather than all at once. Understanding when key obligations apply is important for planning assessments, strengthening documentation and addressing gaps before they become business or compliance risks.
For many organisations, the challenge is not only understanding these milestones, but also translating them into practical action. TÜV SÜD helps organisations assess whether their AI systems, documentation and governance measures are aligned with relevant EU AI Act requirements, so they can prioritise next steps with greater clarity.
TÜV SÜD’s service combines regulatory understanding with a structured technical assessment. The exact scope depends on the AI system, intended use, organisational role and assessment objective, but the review may cover the following areas:
Applicable EU AI Act requirements
Assessment criteria derived from relevant EU AI Act articles and supporting references, tailored to the defined scope of review.
Governance and quality-related controls
Review of roles, responsibilities, policies, procedures and internal controls relevant to the AI system within scope.
Technical documentation and evidence
Review of technical documentation, supporting records and other available evidence needed to demonstrate alignment within the defined scope.
Risk and gap analysis
Identification of missing controls, documentation gaps, unclear responsibilities and other areas requiring attention.
Audit and evidence review
Structured review activities using defined protocols and checklists to evaluate whether documented measures are supported by available evidence.
Assessment reporting and attestation
A documented report describing the scope, method and findings of the review, with an Attestation of Conformity issued where the defined criteria are successfully met.
Note: TÜV SÜD’s Attestation of Conformity is a voluntary assessment output based on the defined scope of review. It does not replace the legal obligations of the provider, manufacturer, deployer or other responsible actor under the EU AI Act. It does not replace an EU Declaration of Conformity. It does not by itself enable CE marking. Regulatory responsibility remains with the relevant economic operator. Where the EU AI Act requires formal conformity assessment routes involving a notified body, those routes remain governed by the Act and its applicable procedures.
TÜV SÜD follows a structured process to assess AI systems against relevant EU AI Act requirements within a defined scope.
